Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australian Lending Centre Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 1057
Common law legal professional privilege attaches to all documents obtained or created by ASIC after 16 January 2009 for the dominant purpose of contemplated litigation, including draft and signed witness statements, file notes, and related correspondence, because the relevant purpose was litigation, they were received by ASIC in confidential circumstances, and the proceedings were in contemplation as of that date.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Production of Documents (privilege Claim) / Interlocutory Order (pre Trial Discovery)
- Outcome
- ASIC entitled to maintain privilege claims for all documents coming into existence on or after 16 January 2009; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['legal Professional Privilege' 'confidentiality in Discovery' 'dominant Purpose Test']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Production of Documents (privilege Claim) / Interlocutory Order (pre Trial Discovery)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Are the documents in question subject to legal professional privilege under common law?' 'Were the communications confidential?' 'Were the documents created in contemplation of litigation?' 'Were the documents created for the dominant purpose of litigation?' 'Is the position different for signed witness affidavits?']
Ratio Decidendi
Common law legal professional privilege attaches to all documents obtained or created by ASIC after 16 January 2009 for the dominant purpose of contemplated litigation, including draft and signed witness statements, file notes, and related correspondence, because the relevant purpose was litigation, they were received by ASIC in confidential circumstances, and the proceedings were in contemplation as of that date.
Court Disposition
ASIC entitled to maintain privilege claims for all documents coming into existence on or after 16 January 2009; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ['The parties bring in short minutes of order within 3 days giving effect to the reasons for decision.' 'Short minutes should resolve the status of the interlocutory application of 11 August 2011.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment