Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Letten (No 19) [2012] FCA 375
Receivers are entitled to immediate interim payment of 85% of their remuneration and 100% of expenses for the specified period, subject to safeguards including filing certificates, registrar review, investor objection, and undertakings to repay any overpayments with interest; liquidation costs are properly treated as expenses of the receivership.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Australian Securities and Investments Commission; First Defendant: Mark Ronald Letten; Second Defendant: LGH Holdings Limited (ACN 007 191 943); Third Defendant: 211 Wellington Road Pty Ltd (ACN 092 663 860); Fourth Defendant: Bluemist Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 097 306 922); Fifth Defendant: Dellwood Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 098 505 803); Sixth Defendant: Enmore Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 082 158 487); Seventh Defendant: Firbank Arch Pty Ltd (ACN 059 464 381); Eighth Defendant: Glenline Pty Ltd (ACN 098 532 364); Ninth Defendant: Gerling Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 091 726 457); Tenth Defendant: LGH Administration Pty Ltd (ACN 007 165 069); Eleventh Defendant: LGH Finance Pty Ltd (ACN 078 859 248); Twelfth Defendant: Low Head Village Pty Ltd (ACN 091 731 958); Thirteenth Defendant: Nicholson Street Pty Ltd (ACN 069 104 089); Fourteenth Defendant: Holloway Crest Pty Ltd (ACN 091 731 967); Fifteenth Defendant: Rosebery Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 091 826 229); Sixteenth Defendant: Simms Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 093 504 511); Seventeenth Defendant: SY21 Retail Pty Ltd (ACN 107 874 564); Eighteenth Defendant: The Glen Centre Hawthorn Pty Ltd (ACN 089 906 543); Nineteenth Defendant: Castello Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 088 204 175); Twentieth Defendant: Twinview Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 097 307 278); Twenty First Defendant: Yarra Valley Golf Pty Ltd (ACN 066 632 479); Twenty Second Defendant: Adina Rise Pty Ltd (ACN 083 181 122); Twenty Third Defendant: Albright Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 088 204 166); Twenty Fourth Defendant: Ashfield Rise Pty Ltd (ACN 093 504 806); Twenty Fifth Defendant: Bradfield Corporation Pty Ltd (ACN 088 204 371); Twenty Sixth Defendant: Copeland Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 093 504 824); Twenty Seventh Defendant: Devlin Way Pty Ltd (ACN 088 264 813); Twenty Eighth Defendant: First Hazelwood Pty Ltd (ACN 093 505 303); Twenty Ninth Defendant: Glenbelle Pty Ltd (ACN 097 306 646); Thirtieth Defendant: Glenvale Way Pty Ltd (ACN 088 287 021); Thirty First Defendant: Greenview Lane Pty Ltd (ACN 093 505 312); Thirty Second Defendant: Hallmark Corporation Pty Ltd (ACN 093 505 312); Thirty Third Defendant: Moorleigh Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 088 287 058); Thirty Fourth Defendant: Norton Ridge Pty Ltd (ACN 078 821 066); Thirty Fifth Defendant: Raleigh Glen Pty Ltd (ACN 088 204 380); Thirty Sixth Defendant: Redcrest Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 100 836 486); Thirty Seventh Defendant: Suri Corporation Pty Ltd (ACN 093 505 321); Thirty Eighth Defendant: Sutton Rise Pty Ltd (ACN 088 204 399); Thirty Ninth Defendant: The Virtual Mlmer Pty Ltd (ACN 065 374 665); Fortieth Defendant: Tivendale Pty Ltd (ACN 093 505 349); Forty First Defendant: Tulloch Downes Pty Ltd (ACN 078 895 048); Forty Second Defendant: Mainking Pty Ltd (ACN 100 790 485); Forty Third Defendant: Topglen Pty Ltd (ACN 096 857 564); Forty Fourth Defendant: Allblue Pty Ltd (ACN 100 836 388); Forty Fifth Defendant: Aranbay Pty Ltd (ACN 098 532 319); Forty Sixth Defendant: Melville Corporation Pty Ltd (ACN 091 911 045); Forty Seventh Defendant: Tilley Lane Pty Ltd (ACN 086 136 361); Forty Eighth Defendant: HPSC Pty Ltd (ACN 059 930 139); Forty Ninth Defendant: Jensdale Pty Ltd (ACN 098 367 974); Fiftieth Defendant: Oakdale Rise Pty Ltd (ACN 091 598 908); Fifty First Defendant: Maywood Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 091 599 218); Fifty Second Defendant: Acetrain Pty Ltd (ACN 100 820 282); Fifty Third Defendant: Sage Bay Pty Ltd (ACN 097 306 628); Fifty Fourth Defendant: Tobago Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 093 504 520)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Orders on Remuneration of Receivers
- Outcome
- Interim remuneration orders granted; receivers approved for payment of 85% of fees and 100% of expenses for the relevant period subject to safeguards.
- Legal Topics
- Receivership Remuneration, Unregistered Managed Investment Schemes, Liquidation Expenses, Priority Costs in Insolvency, Interim Remuneration Approval
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Plaintiff
Mark Ronald Letten
First Defendant
LGH Holdings Limited (ACN 007 191 943)
Second Defendant
211 Wellington Road Pty Ltd (ACN 092 663 860)
Third Defendant
Bluemist Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 097 306 922)
Fourth Defendant
Dellwood Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 098 505 803)
Fifth Defendant
Enmore Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 082 158 487)
Sixth Defendant
Firbank Arch Pty Ltd (ACN 059 464 381)
Seventh Defendant
Glenline Pty Ltd (ACN 098 532 364)
Eighth Defendant
Gerling Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 091 726 457)
Ninth Defendant
LGH Administration Pty Ltd (ACN 007 165 069)
Tenth Defendant
LGH Finance Pty Ltd (ACN 078 859 248)
Eleventh Defendant
Low Head Village Pty Ltd (ACN 091 731 958)
Twelfth Defendant
Nicholson Street Pty Ltd (ACN 069 104 089)
Thirteenth Defendant
Holloway Crest Pty Ltd (ACN 091 731 967)
Fourteenth Defendant
Rosebery Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 091 826 229)
Fifteenth Defendant
Simms Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 093 504 511)
Sixteenth Defendant
SY21 Retail Pty Ltd (ACN 107 874 564)
Seventeenth Defendant
The Glen Centre Hawthorn Pty Ltd (ACN 089 906 543)
Eighteenth Defendant
Castello Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 088 204 175)
Nineteenth Defendant
Twinview Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 097 307 278)
Twentieth Defendant
Yarra Valley Golf Pty Ltd (ACN 066 632 479)
Twenty First Defendant
Adina Rise Pty Ltd (ACN 083 181 122)
Twenty Second Defendant
Albright Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 088 204 166)
Twenty Third Defendant
Ashfield Rise Pty Ltd (ACN 093 504 806)
Twenty Fourth Defendant
Bradfield Corporation Pty Ltd (ACN 088 204 371)
Twenty Fifth Defendant
Copeland Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 093 504 824)
Twenty Sixth Defendant
Devlin Way Pty Ltd (ACN 088 264 813)
Twenty Seventh Defendant
First Hazelwood Pty Ltd (ACN 093 505 303)
Twenty Eighth Defendant
Glenbelle Pty Ltd (ACN 097 306 646)
Twenty Ninth Defendant
Glenvale Way Pty Ltd (ACN 088 287 021)
Thirtieth Defendant
Greenview Lane Pty Ltd (ACN 093 505 312)
Thirty First Defendant
Hallmark Corporation Pty Ltd (ACN 093 505 312)
Thirty Second Defendant
Moorleigh Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 088 287 058)
Thirty Third Defendant
Norton Ridge Pty Ltd (ACN 078 821 066)
Thirty Fourth Defendant
Raleigh Glen Pty Ltd (ACN 088 204 380)
Thirty Fifth Defendant
Redcrest Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 100 836 486)
Thirty Sixth Defendant
Suri Corporation Pty Ltd (ACN 093 505 321)
Thirty Seventh Defendant
Sutton Rise Pty Ltd (ACN 088 204 399)
Thirty Eighth Defendant
The Virtual Mlmer Pty Ltd (ACN 065 374 665)
Thirty Ninth Defendant
Tivendale Pty Ltd (ACN 093 505 349)
Fortieth Defendant
Tulloch Downes Pty Ltd (ACN 078 895 048)
Forty First Defendant
Mainking Pty Ltd (ACN 100 790 485)
Forty Second Defendant
Topglen Pty Ltd (ACN 096 857 564)
Forty Third Defendant
Allblue Pty Ltd (ACN 100 836 388)
Forty Fourth Defendant
Aranbay Pty Ltd (ACN 098 532 319)
Forty Fifth Defendant
Melville Corporation Pty Ltd (ACN 091 911 045)
Forty Sixth Defendant
Tilley Lane Pty Ltd (ACN 086 136 361)
Forty Seventh Defendant
HPSC Pty Ltd (ACN 059 930 139)
Forty Eighth Defendant
Jensdale Pty Ltd (ACN 098 367 974)
Forty Ninth Defendant
Oakdale Rise Pty Ltd (ACN 091 598 908)
Fiftieth Defendant
Maywood Investments Pty Ltd (ACN 091 599 218)
Fifty First Defendant
Acetrain Pty Ltd (ACN 100 820 282)
Fifty Second Defendant
Sage Bay Pty Ltd (ACN 097 306 628)
Fifty Third Defendant
Tobago Holdings Pty Ltd (ACN 093 504 520)
Fifty Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Orders on Remuneration of Receivers
Legal Issues
- 1 Should receivers be entitled to immediate payment of remuneration, costs and expenses on an interim basis?
- 2 Is 85% of remuneration and 100% of expenses the appropriate percentage for interim payment?
- 3 Should liquidation costs of Corporate Defendants be treated as receivership expenses?
Ratio Decidendi
Receivers are entitled to immediate interim payment of 85% of their remuneration and 100% of expenses for the specified period, subject to safeguards including filing certificates, registrar review, investor objection, and undertakings to repay any overpayments with interest; liquidation costs are properly treated as expenses of the receivership.
Court Disposition
Interim remuneration orders granted; receivers approved for payment of 85% of fees and 100% of expenses for the relevant period subject to safeguards.
Orders
- Receivers’ interim remuneration for period 3 July 2010 to 31 December 2011 as specified in schedule approved for payment.
- Receivers justified in allocation of remuneration, costs, and expenses as per specified parameters.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment