ASIC v Rich [2004] NSWSC 1062
In a civil proceeding without a jury, evidence given on the voir dire is, unless otherwise ordered under s 135 or 136 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), evidence in the proceeding generally. The court will not, as a general or advance ruling, restrict such evidence to the voir dire only; any limitation or exclusion should be decided specifically if and when required, after considering the nature of the evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Penalty Proceeding / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admissibility of Expert Evidence on Voir Dire
- Outcome
- Evidence given on voir dire is evidence in the proceeding generally, subject to further order.
- Legal Topics
- ['expert Evidence' 'voir Dire' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'civil Penalty Proceedings' 'discretionary Exclusion of Evidence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil Penalty Proceeding / Interlocutory Application Regarding Admissibility of Expert Evidence on Voir Dire
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether defendants may cross-examine the plaintiff's expert (Mr Carter) on the voir dire" 'Whether evidence adduced on voir dire is evidence in the proceeding generally or only upon tendering after the voir dire' "Whether discretion under ss 135 and 136 of Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) should be exercised before the commencement of the witness's evidence on voir dire"]
Ratio Decidendi
In a civil proceeding without a jury, evidence given on the voir dire is, unless otherwise ordered under s 135 or 136 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), evidence in the proceeding generally. The court will not, as a general or advance ruling, restrict such evidence to the voir dire only; any limitation or exclusion should be decided specifically if and when required, after considering the nature of the evidence.
Court Disposition
Evidence given on voir dire is evidence in the proceeding generally, subject to further order.
Orders
- ['It is permissible for Mr Carter to be cross-examined on voir dire, but such evidence will be evidence in the proceeding unless excluded or restricted by subsequent order under ss 135 or 136 of the Evidence Act.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment