Australian Securities Commission v Solomon, Emad Kamel & Ors [1996] FCA 28

Australian Securities Commission v Solomon, Emad Kamel & Ors [1996] FCA 28

Given the demonstrated deficiency in assets, lack of proper records, intermingling of funds, conflict of interest, and risk to the interests of creditors and the public, and in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary, it is essential and appropriate that a provisional liquidator be appointed to the three corporate respondents immediately under s472(2) and s461(h) of the Corporations Law.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 February 1996
Procedural Posture
Corporations Law Application for the Appointment of a Provisional Liquidator / Determination of Application for Appointment of Provisional Liquidator
Outcome
Provisional liquidator appointed as sought by applicant.
Legal Topics
['appointment of Provisional Liquidator' 'winding Up of Companies' 'corporate Insolvency' 'breach of Legal Requirements by Directors']
['corporations Law' 'insolvency'] ['appointment of Provisional Liquidator' 'winding Up of Companies' 'corporate Insolvency' 'breach of Legal Requirements by Directors']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Corporations Law Application for the Appointment of a Provisional Liquidator / Determination of Application for Appointment of Provisional Liquidator

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether provisional liquidator should be appointed to the corporate respondents pursuant to s461(h) and s472 of the Corporations Law' 'Whether there is a reasonable prospect of a winding up order being made' 'Whether there is urgent necessity to appoint a provisional liquidator to preserve assets and protect the interests of creditors, members, and the public']

Ratio Decidendi

Given the demonstrated deficiency in assets, lack of proper records, intermingling of funds, conflict of interest, and risk to the interests of creditors and the public, and in the absence of substantial evidence to the contrary, it is essential and appropriate that a provisional liquidator be appointed to the three corporate respondents immediately under s472(2) and s461(h) of the Corporations Law.

Court Disposition

Provisional liquidator appointed as sought by applicant.

Orders

  • ["Brian Raymond Silvia to remain as receiver and manager of First Respondent's assets per March 1995 order." 'Brian Raymond Silvia appointed as provisional liquidator of Second, Third, and Fourth Respondents.' 'Provisional liquidator to retain or be given possession of all property of the Second, Third, and Fourth...