Australian Securities Commission v Avram [1996] FCA 1009
A notice under s.19(3) of the Australian Securities Commission Act 1989 that refers to the management of affairs of specific companies and a breach of a precise legislative provision (here, s.229(3) of the Corporations Law) provides a sufficiently clear statement of the general nature of the matter for the purposes of validity, and there is no requirement to specify the conduct in further detail nor to name alleged contravenors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Judgment Following Contested Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Notice Requirements' 'investigatory Powers' 'examination Procedures']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment Following Contested Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether notice under s.19 of the Australian Securities Commission Act 1989 stated the 'general nature of the matter' under investigation" 'Whether the notice must identify the conduct or identity of persons under investigation' 'Sufficiency of reference to alleged contravention in notice']
Ratio Decidendi
A notice under s.19(3) of the Australian Securities Commission Act 1989 that refers to the management of affairs of specific companies and a breach of a precise legislative provision (here, s.229(3) of the Corporations Law) provides a sufficiently clear statement of the general nature of the matter for the purposes of validity, and there is no requirement to specify the conduct in further detail nor to name alleged contravenors.
Court Disposition
Application allowed with costs
Orders
- ['The respondent shall appear, on a date and at a time to be fixed, for examination on oath or affirmation and to answer questions put, and to give the applicant all reasonable assistance in accordance with the requirements of the notice dated 19 June 1996.' 'Application allowed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment