ASIC v Australian Investors Forum Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2005] NSWSC 267
Numerous contraventions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) were found proven against the second and third defendants: AIF contravened disclosure provisions when offering shares without a disclosure document and without complying with s.708(10) exemption; Mr Lloyd-Cocks was involved with actual knowledge in several of those contraventions, breached director’s duties through dishonest and improper purpose transactions, and was involved in breaches of dealer’s licence conditions and related party prohibitions. Mr Anthony, while an undischarged bankrupt, managed corporations contrary to s.206A, participated and authorised dishonest and improper transactions for benefit of himself and...
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Australian Securities & Investments Commission; First Defendant: Australian Investors Forum Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Dennis Ralph Anthony; Third Defendant: Martin Lloyd-Cocks; Fourth Defendant: Dominic Luvara; Fifth Defendant: Peter Victor Topperwien; Sixth Defendant: Bud Shaheen; Seventh Defendant: Australian Capital Forum Pty Ltd; Eighth Defendant: Medionics Pty Ltd; Ninth Defendant: Sage Global Fund Ltd; Tenth Defendant: Techlogica Pty Ltd; Eleventh Defendant: Suisse Credit Pty Ltd; Twelfth Defendant: Swiss Pacific Inc; Thirteenth Defendant: Nominee Securities Pty Ltd; Fourteenth Defendant: Finance Projects Pty Ltd; Fifteenth Defendant: Money Mint Pty Ltd; Sixteenth Defendant: Casabanca Pty Ltd; Seventeenth Defendant: Business Franchises Pty Ltd; Eighteenth Defendant: Webfeatures Pty Ltd; Nineteenth Defendant: Sacvere Pty Ltd; Twentieth Defendant: Associated Asset Management; Twenty First Defendant: IT Genius Pty Ltd; Twenty Second Defendant: Moneytec Investment Management Ltd; Twenty Third Defendant: Metrobank Pty Ltd; Twenty Fourth Defendant: Australian Equity Forum Pty Ltd; Twenty Fifth Defendant: Tax Law Accounting Pty Ltd; Twenty Sixth Defendant: Tax Law Accounting Partnership Pty Ltd; Twenty Seventh Defendant: Biotech Securities Ltd; Twenty Eighth Defendant: Arbitrage Trading Pty Ltd; Twenty Ninth Defendant: Whitton & Lombe
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Liability Judgment, Further Evidence and Submissions as to Consequential Relief Stood Over
- Outcome
- Numerous contraventions of the Corporations Act found proved; proceedings stood over for evidence and submissions as to consequential relief. Orders as to relief and costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Director Duties, Disclosure Requirements, Promoter Liability, Dealers Licence Conditions, Management by Bankrupts, Related Party Transactions, Share Dilution, Remedies for Breach, Corporations Act Civil Penalty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Securities & Investments Commission
Plaintiff
Australian Investors Forum Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Dennis Ralph Anthony
Second Defendant
Martin Lloyd-Cocks
Third Defendant
Dominic Luvara
Fourth Defendant
Peter Victor Topperwien
Fifth Defendant
Bud Shaheen
Sixth Defendant
Australian Capital Forum Pty Ltd
Seventh Defendant
Medionics Pty Ltd
Eighth Defendant
Sage Global Fund Ltd
Ninth Defendant
Techlogica Pty Ltd
Tenth Defendant
Suisse Credit Pty Ltd
Eleventh Defendant
Swiss Pacific Inc
Twelfth Defendant
Nominee Securities Pty Ltd
Thirteenth Defendant
Finance Projects Pty Ltd
Fourteenth Defendant
Money Mint Pty Ltd
Fifteenth Defendant
Casabanca Pty Ltd
Sixteenth Defendant
Business Franchises Pty Ltd
Seventeenth Defendant
Webfeatures Pty Ltd
Eighteenth Defendant
Sacvere Pty Ltd
Nineteenth Defendant
Associated Asset Management
Twentieth Defendant
IT Genius Pty Ltd
Twenty First Defendant
Moneytec Investment Management Ltd
Twenty Second Defendant
Metrobank Pty Ltd
Twenty Third Defendant
Australian Equity Forum Pty Ltd
Twenty Fourth Defendant
Tax Law Accounting Pty Ltd
Twenty Fifth Defendant
Tax Law Accounting Partnership Pty Ltd
Twenty Sixth Defendant
Biotech Securities Ltd
Twenty Seventh Defendant
Arbitrage Trading Pty Ltd
Twenty Eighth Defendant
Whitton & Lombe
Twenty Ninth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Liability Judgment, Further Evidence and Submissions as to Consequential Relief Stood Over
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether directors and officers contravened disclosure and related party provisions of the Corporations Act
- 2 Whether company contravened dealer’s licence conditions
- 3 Whether undischarged bankrupt participated in management in breach of Act
Ratio Decidendi
Numerous contraventions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) were found proven against the second and third defendants: AIF contravened disclosure provisions when offering shares without a disclosure document and without complying with s.708(10) exemption; Mr Lloyd-Cocks was involved with actual knowledge in several of those contraventions, breached director’s duties through dishonest and improper purpose transactions, and was involved in breaches of dealer’s licence conditions and related party prohibitions. Mr Anthony, while an undischarged bankrupt, managed corporations contrary to s.206A, participated and authorised dishonest and improper transactions for benefit of himself and...
Court Disposition
Numerous contraventions of the Corporations Act found proved; proceedings stood over for evidence and submissions as to consequential relief. Orders as to relief and costs reserved.
Orders
- Proceedings stood over for hearing as to relief sought in Further Amended Statement of Claim.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment