ASIC v Adler &4 Ors [2001] NSWSC 777
In the absence of any identified prejudice to a fair trial and given the interests of open justice, the Court orders the release of all Defendants’ filed defences to the applicant media entity.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Australian Securities & Investments Commission; First Defendant: Rodney Stephen Adler; Second Defendant: Raymond Reginald Williams; Third Defendant: Domenic Fodera; Fourth Defendant: Adler Corporation Pty Ltd (ACN 054 924 373); Fifth Defendant: Lynda Sharon Adler
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory Decision Regarding Release of Pleadings to Media
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Release of Pleadings, Open Justice, Media Access Before Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Securities & Investments Commission
Plaintiff
Rodney Stephen Adler
First Defendant
Raymond Reginald Williams
Second Defendant
Domenic Fodera
Third Defendant
Adler Corporation Pty Ltd (ACN 054 924 373)
Fourth Defendant
Lynda Sharon Adler
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Decision Regarding Release of Pleadings to Media
Legal Issues
- 1 Should filed defences in the proceedings be released to media prior to trial?
- 2 Does Practice Note 97 or open justice principles preclude such release?
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of any identified prejudice to a fair trial and given the interests of open justice, the Court orders the release of all Defendants’ filed defences to the applicant media entity.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- All defences by the First to Fifth Defendants be made available to the applicant as and when filed and photocopies made accordingly.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment