ASIC v Ludgates Corporate & Investment Advisory Services Pty Ltd (No. 1) [2005] FCA 827
In light of the Applicant's undertaking not to seek relief under s780 against the Second or Third Respondent, the objection to the amendments loses significance; the amendments to the statement of claim are allowed.
- Parties
- Applicant: Australian Securities & Investments Commission; First Respondent: Ludgates Corporate & Investment Advisory Services Pty Ltd (ACN 053 972 320); Second Respondent: Benjamin Paul Whitehouse; Third Respondent: Jennifer Martine Sisson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Amendment of Pleadings, Liquidation, Securities Adviser Status, Dealer Licence Contravention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Securities & Investments Commission
Applicant
Ludgates Corporate & Investment Advisory Services Pty Ltd (ACN 053 972 320)
First Respondent
Benjamin Paul Whitehouse
Second Respondent
Jennifer Martine Sisson
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to amend paragraphs 11(c), 17(c), 23(c) and 29(c) of the statement of claim
- 2 Whether proposed amendments expose respondents to allegations under s780 of the Corporations Law
Ratio Decidendi
In light of the Applicant's undertaking not to seek relief under s780 against the Second or Third Respondent, the objection to the amendments loses significance; the amendments to the statement of claim are allowed.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Leave granted to the Applicant to amend paragraphs 11(c), 17(c), 23(c) and 29(c) of the statement of claim in accordance with the 'Third Version of Second Amended Statement of Claim' (Exhibit AA2) upon the Applicant's undertaking not to seek relief under section 780 of the Corporations Law for alleged contraventions...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment