Australian Securities Ltd v Borina Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1073
Leave granted to file a cross-claim for account taking, money had and received and ACL s 21 unconscionability, as these causes of action are not futile; breach of contract and damages claims cannot proceed. The Defendant may pursue additional head of damage contingent on providing $10,000 extra security. Defendant to pay 50% of Plaintiff's costs of the motion.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion (cross Claim in Discontinued Proceedings) / Interlocutory Application for Leave to File Cross Claim
- Outcome
- Leave granted in part; orders made as specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['mortgages' 'redemption of Mortgage' 'account Taking' 'money Had and Received' 'unconscionable Conduct' 'breach of Contract' 'claim for Damages' 'security for Costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion (cross Claim in Discontinued Proceedings) / Interlocutory Application for Leave to File Cross Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to file a cross-claim seeking account, money had and received, relief for breaches of s 21 of the ACL' "Whether mortgagor's causes of action for breach of contract and damages are futile" 'Whether claim for unconscionable conduct under s 21 ACL is available' 'Whether additional security for further head of damage can be ordered']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave granted to file a cross-claim for account taking, money had and received and ACL s 21 unconscionability, as these causes of action are not futile; breach of contract and damages claims cannot proceed. The Defendant may pursue additional head of damage contingent on providing $10,000 extra security. Defendant to pay 50% of Plaintiff's costs of the motion.
Court Disposition
Leave granted in part; orders made as specified.
Orders
- ['Leave to Defendant to file cross-claim seeking account, claim for money had and received, and relief for breaches of s 21 ACL.' 'On payment to Plaintiff of $10,000, leave to Defendant to claim additional head of damage specified in second proposed cross-claim.' "Defendant to pay 50% of Plaintiff's costs of Notice...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment