Australian Village No. 12 – Gladstone St Pty Ltd v Inner West Council [2021] NSWLEC 1080
Clause 6.13(3)(c) of Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011 is a development standard, not a prohibition. However, the applicant's clause 4.6 objection does not adequately demonstrate that compliance with the 60% non-residential requirement is unreasonable or unnecessary, nor that the development is consistent with the objectives of the standard or the zone. Therefore, the Court has no power to grant consent and must refuse the application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'clause 4.6 Objection' 'floor Space Requirement' 'affordable Housing' 'development Standards' 'local Environmental Plan' 'state Environmental Planning Policy']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Proper characterisation of the development application' 'Whether clause 6.13(3)(c) of Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011 is a development standard or a prohibition' "Whether the applicant's clause 4.6 objection demonstrates that compliance with the development standard is unreasonable or unnecessary" 'Whether there are sufficient environmental planning grounds for varying the standard' 'Whether the development is consistent with the objectives of the zone and the standard']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 6.13(3)(c) of Marrickville Local Environmental Plan 2011 is a development standard, not a prohibition. However, the applicant's clause 4.6 objection does not adequately demonstrate that compliance with the 60% non-residential requirement is unreasonable or unnecessary, nor that the development is consistent with the objectives of the standard or the zone. Therefore, the Court has no power to grant consent and must refuse the application.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'Development application DA/2020/0366 for change of use of level 1 and minor alterations to the development approved by consent granted on 8 April 2020 at 2-2A Gladstone Street, Newtown is refused.' 'Exhibits, other than Exhibits A and 1, to be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment