BlueScope Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd v AWU [2006] NSWIRComm 248
The Commission held that the proposed changes were matters of management prerogative and that the Union had not established that introducing senior operator positions, deleting existing leading hand positions, or reducing allocated paid breaks by removing the paid shower break would impose an unjust or unreasonable burden on employees or render the working environment inherently unsafe. The risk that the changes might not achieve projected productivity gains was a risk for the Company, not a basis for Commission intervention. Because no such unjust or unreasonable consequence was demonstrated, the status quo restriction should be removed and implementation of the changes should no longer...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Dispute Notification Under Section 130 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 Concerning Introduction of Change in Plate Mill Despatch and Processing Departments / Arbitration Under Section 146 a Referral Agreements After Unsuccessful Conciliation
- Outcome
- Status quo restriction removed; implementation of the proposed changes no longer impeded; proceedings concluded.
- Legal Topics
- ['introduction of Workplace Change' 'management Prerogative' 'manning and Classification Changes' 'paid Breaks' 'status Quo Restriction' 'workplace Productivity and Efficiency' 'unjust or Unreasonable Burden on Employees' 'work Health and Safety Concerns']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Industrial Dispute Notification Under Section 130 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 Concerning Introduction of Change in Plate Mill Despatch and Processing Departments / Arbitration Under Section 146 a Referral Agreements After Unsuccessful Conciliation
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether BlueScope Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd should be permitted to implement the introduction of senior operator positions and deletion of existing leading hand operator positions in the Plate Mill despatch and processing departments.' 'Whether the proposed reduction in allocated paid breaks per shift from 90 minutes to 60 minutes, by removing a paid 30 minute shower break, would impose unjust or unreasonable demands on employees or make the work environment inherently unsafe.' 'Whether the status quo restriction invoked by the Union should be removed.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission held that the proposed changes were matters of management prerogative and that the Union had not established that introducing senior operator positions, deleting existing leading hand positions, or reducing allocated paid breaks by removing the paid shower break would impose an unjust or unreasonable burden on employees or render the working environment inherently unsafe. The risk that the changes might not achieve projected productivity gains was a risk for the Company, not a basis for Commission intervention. Because no such unjust or unreasonable consequence was demonstrated, the status quo restriction should be removed and implementation of the changes should no longer...
Court Disposition
Status quo restriction removed; implementation of the proposed changes no longer impeded; proceedings concluded.
Orders
- ['The status quo restriction on the implementation of the proposed introduction of senior operator positions, including the deletion of existing leading hand positions, is removed forthwith.' 'The status quo restriction on the proposed reduction in allocated paid breaks per shift is removed forthwith.' 'Employees of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment