Nand v R [2014] NSWCCA 293
The appeal was dismissed because the evidence showed that the applicant's delay in entering a guilty plea was not the result of inadequate legal advice but of his own choices and dishonesty; the judge properly considered all evidence, including medical and subjective accounts, and the sentence was within the appropriate range given the seriousness of the offences, the applicant's lack of genuine remorse, and previous criminal history.
- Parties
- Applicant: Avineshwar Nand; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted but the appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Appeal Against Sentence, Sexual Offences, Discount for Guilty Plea, Consideration of Medical Evidence, Subjective Circumstances in Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Avineshwar Nand
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences imposed were severe and manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether false advice was received from incompetent legal representatives affecting the guilty plea
- 3 Whether expert medical reports tendered by defence were not considered by sentencing judge
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the evidence showed that the applicant's delay in entering a guilty plea was not the result of inadequate legal advice but of his own choices and dishonesty; the judge properly considered all evidence, including medical and subjective accounts, and the sentence was within the appropriate range given the seriousness of the offences, the applicant's lack of genuine remorse, and previous criminal history.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted but the appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal be granted but the appeal be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment