Webster, in the matter of Willmott Forests Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrators Appointed) v Fernandez [2012] FCA 82

Webster, in the matter of Willmott Forests Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrators Appointed) v Fernandez [2012] FCA 82

The $200,000 transferred from the NAB account constituted property of WFL subject to a floating charge under the deeds of charge, which crystallised and became a fixed charge on the appointment of receivers, entitling the receivers to possession. There was no evidence tracing Bombala land proceeds into the NAB account, nor evidence of an equitable or statutory lien with priority over the receivers. The plaintiffs are entitled to possession of the $200,000 plus interest.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
13 February 2012
Procedural Posture
Originating Process for Directions and Declarations Under S 424(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Judgment on the Papers
Outcome
Declarations and directions made in favour of the plaintiffs; costs awarded to plaintiffs.
Legal Topics
['receivership' "administrator's Lien" 'priority of Charges' 'tracing' 'court Directions']
['corporations Law' 'insolvency'] ['receivership' "administrator's Lien" 'priority of Charges' 'tracing' 'court Directions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Originating Process for Directions and Declarations Under S 424(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Judgment on the Papers

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether moneys in the NAB account formed part of the 'Charged Property' at the time of the receivers' appointment" 'Whether receivers were entitled to possession of the moneys in the NAB account' 'Whether the defendant had a lien over the funds with priority over the deeds of charge' 'Whether the funds transferred to the Fernandez Partners account could be traced as proceeds of excluded property' 'The power of the court to grant the relief sought']

Ratio Decidendi

The $200,000 transferred from the NAB account constituted property of WFL subject to a floating charge under the deeds of charge, which crystallised and became a fixed charge on the appointment of receivers, entitling the receivers to possession. There was no evidence tracing Bombala land proceeds into the NAB account, nor evidence of an equitable or statutory lien with priority over the receivers. The plaintiffs are entitled to possession of the $200,000 plus interest.

Court Disposition

Declarations and directions made in favour of the plaintiffs; costs awarded to plaintiffs.

Orders

  • ["Declaration that 'Charged Property' includes all moneys held in the NAB bank account at the time of appointment." 'Direction that plaintiffs are lawfully entitled to possession of $200,000 transferred from the NAB account to Fernandez Partners Trust account plus interest from 6 September 2010.' "The defendant to...