AWU16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 1241
The delay of three days is sufficiently explained and, given the applicant’s circumstances and the merits of the s 438 ground, it is in the interests of the administration of justice to extend time for appeal.
- Parties
- Applicant: AWU16; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Extension of time granted and leave to appeal out of time granted.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals, Judicial Review, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AWU16
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s 438 certificate issue is sufficient to grant extension of time
- 2 Whether there was a reasonable explanation for delay in filing
- 3 Whether it is in the interests of the administration of justice to grant extension
Ratio Decidendi
The delay of three days is sufficiently explained and, given the applicant’s circumstances and the merits of the s 438 ground, it is in the interests of the administration of justice to extend time for appeal.
Court Disposition
Extension of time granted and leave to appeal out of time granted.
Orders
- The time in which the applicant may file an appeal is extended to 18 October 2018.
- The draft notice of appeal filed on 18 October 2018 stands as the notice of appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment