AYE16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 108
The grounds of appeal do not assert any jurisdictional error, and none is apparent from the record; the applicant seeks merits review, which is not the function of the Court, and the Tribunal’s credibility findings and consideration of claims were open to it on the evidence. The failure to disclose the s 438 certificate was not a jurisdictional error as the relevant documents were not material to the Tribunal's decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Assessment' 'merits Review' 'public Interest Certificate']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the decision of the Federal Circuit Court dismissing the judicial review was affected by jurisdictional error' "Whether the grounds of appeal establish jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision" 'Whether failure to provide a s 438 certificate amounts to jurisdictional error' 'Whether allegations of actual or apprehended bias by the Tribunal member are made out']
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds of appeal do not assert any jurisdictional error, and none is apparent from the record; the applicant seeks merits review, which is not the function of the Court, and the Tribunal’s credibility findings and consideration of claims were open to it on the evidence. The failure to disclose the s 438 certificate was not a jurisdictional error as the relevant documents were not material to the Tribunal's decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent, to be assessed if not agreed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment