AZO24 v Registrar, Registry of New South Wales, Federal Court of Australia [2024] FCA 1151

AZO24 v Registrar, Registry of New South Wales, Federal Court of Australia [2024] FCA 1151

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to advance any arguable basis for staying the proceeding or orders; the claims of bias were vague and unparticularised and did not warrant the orders sought.

Parties
Applicant: AZO24; First Respondent: Registrar, Registry of New South Wales, Federal Court of Australia; Second Respondent: Thomas Stewart, National Registrar, Federal Court of Australia
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
01 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in Appellate Proceedings / Interlocutory Application Determination
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Suppression Orders, Interlocutory Stay, Apprehended Bias

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AZO24

Applicant

Registrar, Registry of New South Wales, Federal Court of Australia

First Respondent

Thomas Stewart, National Registrar, Federal Court of Australia

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application in Appellate Proceedings / Interlocutory Application Determination

  1. 1 Whether to grant a stay of execution of proceedings pending appeal
  2. 2 Whether to suspend or stay suppression orders relating to applicant's identity
  3. 3 Whether the allegation of apprehended bias provides a basis for a stay

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to advance any arguable basis for staying the proceeding or orders; the claims of bias were vague and unparticularised and did not warrant the orders sought.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The applicant's interlocutory application is dismissed.