AZZ20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 414
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant had notice of the hearing date, had been reminded that the appeal was listed for in-person hearing, and there was no appearance by or on behalf of the appellant when the appeal was called for hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Hearing of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['dismissal of Appeal for Non Appearance' 'federal Court Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Hearing of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the appeal should be dismissed pursuant to r 36.75(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) because the appellant was absent when the appeal was called on for hearing.']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant had notice of the hearing date, had been reminded that the appeal was listed for in-person hearing, and there was no appearance by or on behalf of the appellant when the appeal was called for hearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to rule 36.75(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) the appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal, as agreed or taxed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment