BAA20 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 415
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to appear at the hearing, having had due notice of the hearing date, and the respondent applied for dismissal pursuant to r 36.75(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['dismissal for Non Appearance' 'federal Court Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether appeal should be dismissed for appellant's failure to appear at hearing"]
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to appear at the hearing, having had due notice of the hearing date, and the respondent applied for dismissal pursuant to r 36.75(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed pursuant to rule 36.75(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth).' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal, as agreed or taxed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment