Abdulrahman v R [2016] NSWCCA 192
The sentencing judge erred by treating the Form 1 offence and the applicant's prior record as aggravating the objective seriousness of the principal offence; however, upon re-exercise of the sentencing discretion, no lesser sentence is warranted in law given the objective seriousness and the applicant’s circumstances; therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Law – Sentence Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal and Re Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'aggravated Break and Enter' 'form 1 Offences' 'objective Seriousness' 'retribution' 'youth Offenders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Law – Sentence Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal Decision on Application for Leave to Appeal and Re Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether error occurred in refusing adjournment for psychological report' 'Whether error occurred in assessment of objective seriousness of offence' 'Whether error in treating Form 1 offence as adding to inherent criminality' 'Whether prior record aggravated the present offence' 'Whether error in reference to retribution' "Whether adequate regard was paid to applicant's youth in sentencing" 'Whether lesser sentence should be imposed']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by treating the Form 1 offence and the applicant's prior record as aggravating the objective seriousness of the principal offence; however, upon re-exercise of the sentencing discretion, no lesser sentence is warranted in law given the objective seriousness and the applicant’s circumstances; therefore, the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment