Bagnall v White [1906] HCA 52

Bagnall v White [1906] HCA 52

The High Court held that, due to the difficulty and conflicting authority on whether section 4 of the Statute of Frauds bars actions at law on executed oral agreements for surrender of an interest in land, and given the small amount and procedural nature of the case, special leave to appeal should be rescinded, leaving the existing decision below undisturbed.

Parties
Appellant: Bagnall; Respondent: White
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 August 1906
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Rescind Special Leave to Appeal From a Decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales
Outcome
Special leave to appeal rescinded. Appellant to pay the costs of the appeal.
Legal Topics
Statute of Frauds—application to Surrender of Lease, Executed Contract Under Statute of Frauds, Admissibility of Parol Evidence, Surrender by Operation of Law, Remedies for Breach of Contract for Surrender of Lease
Contract Law Property Law Civil Procedure Statute of Frauds—application to Surrender of Lease Executed Contract Under Statute of Frauds Admissibility of Parol Evidence Surrender by Operation of Law Remedies for Breach of Contract for Surrender of Lease

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 28 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bagnall

Appellant

White

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Rescind Special Leave to Appeal From a Decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an executed oral agreement for surrender of a lease and payment of money in consideration is enforceable at law in light of the Statute of Frauds, section 4, when not in writing
  2. 2 Whether the principle allowing evidence of verbal leases applies to surrender of lease by operation of law
  3. 3 Whether special leave to appeal should be rescinded because of the small amount and procedural nature of the case

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court held that, due to the difficulty and conflicting authority on whether section 4 of the Statute of Frauds bars actions at law on executed oral agreements for surrender of an interest in land, and given the small amount and procedural nature of the case, special leave to appeal should be rescinded, leaving the existing decision below undisturbed.

Court Disposition

Special leave to appeal rescinded. Appellant to pay the costs of the appeal.

Orders

  • Special leave to appeal from the Supreme Court of New South Wales rescinded.
  • Appellant to pay costs of the appeal.