KOPUZ v DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES (NO 2) [1992] NSWCA 125
It was unnecessary to determine the precise source of the power to grant bail; either under the Bail Act 1978 or inherent powers of the Court, the claimant was entitled to bail having established a concrete case raising the prospect of success. Bail was therefore granted pending the outcome of the summons.
- Parties
- Claimant: Engin Kopuz; 1st Opponent: District Court of New South Wales; 2nd Opponent: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Bail Pending Determination of Summons for Prerogative Relief
- Outcome
- bail granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Prerogative Relief, Court of Appeal Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Engin Kopuz
Claimant
District Court of New South Wales
1st Opponent
Director of Public Prosecutions
2nd Opponent
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Bail Pending Determination of Summons for Prerogative Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a single Judge of Appeal may grant bail pending the outcome of a summons for prerogative relief directed to the District Court concerning conviction and sentence in an appeal under the Justices Act 1902
- 2 Whether the power to grant bail derives from the Bail Act 1978 or from the inherent power of the Court of Appeal
Ratio Decidendi
It was unnecessary to determine the precise source of the power to grant bail; either under the Bail Act 1978 or inherent powers of the Court, the claimant was entitled to bail having established a concrete case raising the prospect of success. Bail was therefore granted pending the outcome of the summons.
Court Disposition
bail granted
Orders
- Grant bail to the claimant Engin Kopuz upon conditions: (1) report to the officer-in-charge of Blacktown police station each Thursday before 9 p.m., commencing 21 May 1992 and until determination of the summons or further order; (2) upon reasonable notice by the Registrar to his solicitor of judgment publication,...
- The sentence imposed by Saunders DCJ is suspended and stayed pending further or other orders of the Court of Appeal in the summons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment