Singh v Super City Home Loans Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 83

The applicant failed to establish special reasons for extension of time or sufficient doubt attending the decision to warrant grant of leave. The application for leave to appeal is refused and the amended notice of motion is dismissed.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 14 February 2012
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time
Outcome: Applications for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics: ['leave to Appeal' 'extension of Time' 'interlocutory Judgment' 'joinder of Parties' 'summary Dismissal' 'federal Court Procedure']

['practice and Procedure'] ['leave to Appeal' 'extension of Time' 'interlocutory Judgment' 'joinder of Parties' 'summary Dismissal' 'federal Court Procedure']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether leave to appeal from interlocutory judgment should be granted' 'Whether there are special reasons for extension of time to seek leave to appeal' 'Whether errors were made in summary dismissal and refusal of joinder applications']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Applications for extension of time and leave to appeal dismissed.

Orders

['The amended notice of motion filed by the applicant on 6 July 2011 is dismissed.' "The applicant is to pay the respondents' costs."]