Dadyal v A.V.S Australian Venue Security Services Pty Ltd [2008] NSWADT 110

Dadyal v A.V.S Australian Venue Security Services Pty Ltd [2008] NSWADT 110

The applicant failed to provide necessary relevant evidence establishing the identity or employment of the security guard and any connection between the respondent and the Greenacre Hotel; as a result, the claim must fail.

Parties
Applicant: Baljeet Singh Dadyal; Respondent: A.V.S Australian Venue Security Services Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 April 2008
Procedural Posture
Race Discrimination Complaint / Principal Matter Decision
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Provision of Services
Equal Opportunity Race Discrimination Provision of Services

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Baljeet Singh Dadyal

Applicant

A.V.S Australian Venue Security Services Pty Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Race Discrimination Complaint / Principal Matter Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the applicant on the ground of race in the provision of services
  2. 2 Whether the applicant proved that the respondent was involved in the alleged incident

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide necessary relevant evidence establishing the identity or employment of the security guard and any connection between the respondent and the Greenacre Hotel; as a result, the claim must fail.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application be dismissed
  • No order as to costs