Balog v Independent Commission Against Corruption [1990] HCA 28

Balog v Independent Commission Against Corruption [1990] HCA 28

On the construction of the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 N.S.W., s. 74 did not authorise the Commission to include in a public report findings that the appellants were or may have been guilty of criminal offences or corrupt conduct, except for the limited statement required or permitted by s. 74(5) about whether there was any evidence or sufficient evidence warranting consideration of prosecution, disciplinary action or termination-related action. Because the matter was not referred by Parliament, the Commission also had no function under s. 13(2)(a) to determine whether corrupt conduct may have occurred.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal Concerning Declaratory Relief and Construction of the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 N.s.w. / High Court Appeals From the Court of Appeal After the Appellants Were Unsuccessful at First Instance and in the Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeals allowed with costs.
Legal Topics
['independent Commission Against Corruption' 'public Reports' 'corrupt Conduct' 'criminal Liability Findings' 'declaratory Relief']
['administrative Law' 'statutory Interpretation'] ['independent Commission Against Corruption' 'public Reports' 'corrupt Conduct' 'criminal Liability Findings' 'declaratory Relief']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Concerning Declaratory Relief and Construction of the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 N.s.w. / High Court Appeals From the Court of Appeal After the Appellants Were Unsuccessful at First Instance and in the Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Commission was entitled in a report under s. 74 of the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 N.S.W. to state a finding that either appellant was or may have been guilty of a criminal offence other than a statement under s. 74(5).' 'Whether the Commission was entitled, where the matter was not referred by Parliament, to report a finding that corrupt conduct by either appellant occurred or may have occurred.']

Ratio Decidendi

On the construction of the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 N.S.W., s. 74 did not authorise the Commission to include in a public report findings that the appellants were or may have been guilty of criminal offences or corrupt conduct, except for the limited statement required or permitted by s. 74(5) about whether there was any evidence or sufficient evidence warranting consideration of prosecution, disciplinary action or termination-related action. Because the matter was not referred by Parliament, the Commission also had no function under s. 13(2)(a) to determine whether corrupt conduct may have occurred.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal and in lieu thereof order that the appeal to that Court be allowed with costs.' 'Set aside the order of Smart J. dismissing the summons of the respective appellants with costs.' 'Declare that the respondent is not entitled in any report pursuant to s. 74 of the...