Banksia Mortgages Limited v Croker and Anor [2013] NSWSC 270

Banksia Mortgages Limited v Croker and Anor [2013] NSWSC 270

The Court declined to extend the stay because no appeal or proper proceedings to set aside the judgment were on foot, the draft Summons was fundamentally misconceived in form and substance, and no clear foundation was demonstrated for the highly exceptional further extension of an already exceptional stay.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 March 2013
Procedural Posture
Application to Continue a Stay of Judgment / Post Judgment Application Before the Duty Judge
Outcome
Application to extend stay declined.
Legal Topics
['stay of Judgment' 'monetary Judgment' 'possession of Land' 'application to Set Aside Judgment for Fraud' 'pleading Fraud' 'prerogative Relief']
['practice and Procedure' 'civil Procedure'] ['stay of Judgment' 'monetary Judgment' 'possession of Land' 'application to Set Aside Judgment for Fraud' 'pleading Fraud' 'prerogative Relief']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application to Continue a Stay of Judgment / Post Judgment Application Before the Duty Judge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the stay of the monetary judgment granted against Mr and Mrs Croker should be further extended.' 'Whether the draft Summons was an appropriate procedure to commence a claim to set aside Supreme Court orders on the basis of fraud.' 'Whether orders of a Judge of the Supreme Court of New South Wales could be challenged by prerogative relief in the nature of certiorari and mandamus under s.69 Supreme Court Act 1970.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court declined to extend the stay because no appeal or proper proceedings to set aside the judgment were on foot, the draft Summons was fundamentally misconceived in form and substance, and no clear foundation was demonstrated for the highly exceptional further extension of an already exceptional stay.

Court Disposition

Application to extend stay declined.

Orders

  • ['Leave to file the draft Summons declined.' 'The stay will expire at 4.00 pm on 22 March 2013.' 'Mr and Mrs Croker to pay the costs of Banksia Mortgages Limited of today.']