Bankstown City Council v Ramahi (No 3) [2016] NSWLEC 41
The judgment, when read as a whole, required that demolition of the garage be included among the remedial orders, as the erection and location of the garage breached clause 10(1) of Schedule 1 to the State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 (NSW) and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 / Consequential Orders (other Than Costs)
- Outcome
- Orders made substantially as per the draft short minutes, including demolition of the attached garage and other remedial and declaratory relief.
- Legal Topics
- ['practice and Procedure' 'breach of Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (nsw)' 'final Orders' 'demolition Orders' 'invalidity of Certificates' 'remedial Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 / Consequential Orders (other Than Costs)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether demolition of the attached garage should be included in final orders' 'Whether the erection of the garage was in breach of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) and State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 (NSW)' 'Whether the secondary dwelling complied with statutory setback requirements']
Ratio Decidendi
The judgment, when read as a whole, required that demolition of the garage be included among the remedial orders, as the erection and location of the garage breached clause 10(1) of Schedule 1 to the State Environmental Planning Policy (Affordable Rental Housing) 2009 (NSW) and the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Orders made substantially as per the draft short minutes, including demolition of the attached garage and other remedial and declaratory relief.
Orders
- ['Declaration that complying development certificates issued by the Second Respondent are invalid as they were issued in breach of the EPA Act;' 'Declaration that the First Respondent carried out prohibited development, contrary to s 76B of the EPA Act;' 'Declaration that occupation certificates issued by the Second...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment