Bengali v Hadchiti [2009] NSWLEC 1202
The Court found that the Rubber tree, located on the respondent’s property, had caused damage to the applicant’s paving and was likely to cause further damage. The damage satisfied s 10(2)(a) of the Act, and after considering s 12 matters, the Court determined removal of the tree at the respondent’s cost was warranted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Banoo Bengali; Respondent: Simon Hadchiti
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Tree Dispute Application / On Site Hearing and Ex Tempore Judgment
- Outcome
- Application upheld in part; orders made for removal of tree and related works at respondent's cost
- Legal Topics
- Trees (neighbours), Damage to Property, Rectification Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Banoo Bengali
Applicant
Simon Hadchiti
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Tree Dispute Application / On Site Hearing and Ex Tempore Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Rubber tree caused or is likely to cause damage to the applicant's property
- 2 Whether the Court should order the removal of the tree and related works at the owner's cost
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the Rubber tree, located on the respondent’s property, had caused damage to the applicant’s paving and was likely to cause further damage. The damage satisfied s 10(2)(a) of the Act, and after considering s 12 matters, the Court determined removal of the tree at the respondent’s cost was warranted.
Court Disposition
Application upheld in part; orders made for removal of tree and related works at respondent's cost
Orders
- These orders apply to 37 Glassop Street, Yagoona
- The Rubber tree shall be removed, leaving at most a stump of about 100 mm above ground level, and the stump shall be treated to prevent regrowth from the stump and roots
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment