In the matter of FMA Holdings Group Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) [2018] NSWSC 2057
The payments made by FMA Holdings Group Pty Ltd to Banq Accountants and Advisors Pty Ltd are voidable as insolvent uncommercial transactions entered into within two years before the relation back day, because there was no commercial basis for them, they were disproportionate to any accountancy fees, the company benefited negligibly, and the company is presumed to have been insolvent due to a lack of financial records.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Ozem Azzam and Jason Bing-Fai Tang as Joint and Several Liquidators of FMA Holdings Group Pty Ltd (In Liquidation); Second Plaintiff: FMA Holdings Group Pty Ltd (In Liquidation); Defendant: Banq Accountants and Advisors Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Creditor's Voluntary Winding Up Proceeding / Judgment After Undefended Hearing
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up, Voidable Transactions, Insolvent Transactions, Uncommercial Transactions, Director Related Transactions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ozem Azzam and Jason Bing-Fai Tang as Joint and Several Liquidators of FMA Holdings Group Pty Ltd (In Liquidation)
First Plaintiff
FMA Holdings Group Pty Ltd (In Liquidation)
Second Plaintiff
Banq Accountants and Advisors Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Voluntary Winding Up Proceeding / Judgment After Undefended Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether three payments made by FMA Holdings Group Pty Ltd to Banq Accountants and Advisors Pty Ltd are voidable as insolvent uncommercial transactions under Corporations Act 2001
- 2 Whether the payments were made when the company was insolvent and were not for reasonable commercial purposes
- 3 Whether interest is recoverable on the payments
Ratio Decidendi
The payments made by FMA Holdings Group Pty Ltd to Banq Accountants and Advisors Pty Ltd are voidable as insolvent uncommercial transactions entered into within two years before the relation back day, because there was no commercial basis for them, they were disproportionate to any accountancy fees, the company benefited negligibly, and the company is presumed to have been insolvent due to a lack of financial records.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiffs
Orders
- The defendant is to pay the plaintiffs the sum of $919,621.12.
- The defendant is to pay the plaintiffs' costs on the indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment