Baragroup Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council [2017] NSWLEC 1489
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court disposed of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement, upheld the appeal and granted consent subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application Da/635/2016 / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'residential Flat Building' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties' 'development Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Refusal of Development Application Da/635/2016 / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979." 'Whether consent should be granted to development application DA/635/2016 for demolition of existing structures and construction of a three storey residential flat building comprising 5 dwellings and parking for 5 vehicles at 42 Judge Street, Randwick.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court disposed of the proceedings in accordance with that agreement, upheld the appeal and granted consent subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to the applicant to rely on the amended plans listed in condition 1 of the conditions attached and marked "A".' "The Applicant to pay the Respondent's costs pursuant to s97B as agreed in the sum of $ 5830.00 by 22 September 2017." 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Consent is granted to the development...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment