Baraz Construction Pty Ltd v Strathfield Municipal Council [2016] NSWLEC 1249
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement by making the final orders.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'consent Orders' 'residential Flat Building' 'affordable Rental Housing']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference and Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the parties had reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to the terms of a decision acceptable to them.' 'Whether the agreed decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of in accordance with that agreement by making the final orders.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The applicant is given leave to amend their development application by substituting the plans and documentation referred to in Condition 1 of Annexure "A" as the plans relied upon for the purposes of the development application.' 'The Appeal is upheld.' 'Development Consent is granted to modify Development...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment