Byrnes v Ryan (No 3) [2022] NSWLEC 1177
The evidence did not establish that the tree branch itself caused actionable damage to the applicant’s property as required under the Act. However, the risk of future injury or damage from the now more exposed and weakly-attached branch justifies remedial pruning in accordance with safety and professional standards.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, Pt 2 Application / Final Orders
- Outcome
- Orders granted for remedial pruning; no compensation ordered.
- Legal Topics
- ['tree Disputes' 'damage or Injury Caused by Trees' 'pruning Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006, Pt 2 Application / Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a tree has caused damage to the applicant's property" 'Whether current circumstances justify new orders given previous orders' 'Whether risk of future injury or damage warrants intervention' 'Whether applicant has made reasonable efforts to reach agreement']
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not establish that the tree branch itself caused actionable damage to the applicant’s property as required under the Act. However, the risk of future injury or damage from the now more exposed and weakly-attached branch justifies remedial pruning in accordance with safety and professional standards.
Court Disposition
Orders granted for remedial pruning; no compensation ordered.
Orders
- ['Respondents to engage and pay for a qualified arborist to prune the tree within 60 days to remove one branch over the applicant’s dwelling.' 'Pruning must be conducted by a suitably qualified arborist (minimum AQF level 3) with all appropriate insurance.' "Works to be performed according to Safe Work Australia...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment