Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22

Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22

Objective evidence of skid marks and the vehicle's final position, contemporaneously recorded, was inconsistent with the appellant's version of events and expert's assumptions. The majority of the Court of Appeal were correct in finding that the trial judge erred, and their substitution of judgment for the respondent was warranted by the facts incontrovertibly established.

Parties
Appellant: Barbara Fox; Respondent: Megan L Percy
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Appeal Decision
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Appellate Review, Findings of Fact, Credibility of Witnesses, Expert Evidence
Tort Law Civil Procedure Negligence Appellate Review Findings of Fact Credibility of Witnesses Expert Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Barbara Fox

Appellant

Megan L Percy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Appeal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal erred in reversing the trial judge's factual findings based on credibility
  2. 2 Whether findings of fact can be disturbed if inconsistent with incontrovertible evidence
  3. 3 Appropriateness of the appellate court substituting its own judgment or ordering a new trial

Ratio Decidendi

Objective evidence of skid marks and the vehicle's final position, contemporaneously recorded, was inconsistent with the appellant's version of events and expert's assumptions. The majority of the Court of Appeal were correct in finding that the trial judge erred, and their substitution of judgment for the respondent was warranted by the facts incontrovertibly established.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs