Shaw v Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2009] FCA 844
There is a serious question to be tried as to whether the Minister is obliged to accord the tenants affected by a proposed notice under s 47(1) of the NER Act clear information about the extinguishment of their tenancy rights and a fair opportunity to be heard. The current measures have not adequately discharged that obligation. There is also a serious question to be tried in respect of whether the execution of the proposed sub-leases by Housing Associations is contrary to the interests of members as a whole in the absence of the compulsion threat. The balance of convenience favours restraining the Minister and the other parties from acting as proposed until the affected persons are...
- Parties
- Applicant: Barbara Rachel Shaw; Applicant: George Robertson Jampitjinpa; Applicant: Gwen Gillen; Applicant: Warren Tonkin; Applicant: Melissa Brown; Applicant: Marlene Hayes; Applicant: Kevin Wirri; Applicant: Vanessa Kruger; Applicant: Maureen Williams; Applicant: Rachel Jurra; Applicant: Rosemary Rubuntja; Applicant: Audrey McCormack; Applicant: Pamela Sampson; Applicant: Cheryl McMillan; Respondent / First Respondent: Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs; Second Respondent: Executive Director of Township Leasing; Third Respondent: Northern Territory of Australia; Fourth Respondent: Iiparpa Aboriginal Corporation; Fourth Respondent: Karnte Aboriginal Corporation; Fourth Respondent: Anthepe Housing Association; Fourth Respondent: Ilyperenye Association Inc; Fourth Respondent: Inarlange Community Inc; Fourth Respondent: Mpwetyerre Aboriginal Corporation; Fourth Respondent: Yarrrenyte Arltere Association Inc; Fourth Respondent: Akngwertnarre Association Inc; Fourth Respondent: Nyewente Association Inc; Fourth Respondent: Anthelk Ewlpaye Association Inc; Fourth Respondent: Aper Alwerrknge Association Inc; Fourth Respondent: Mt Nancy Housing Association Inc; Fourth Respondent: Ilperle Tyathe Association Inc; Fourth Respondent: Ilpeye Ilpeye Aboriginal Corporation; Fourth Respondent: Ewyenper Atwatye Association Inc; Fourth Respondent: Anhelke Aboriginal Corporation; Fourth Respondent: Lhenpe Artnew Aboriginal Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Representative/interlocutory Injunction Applications / Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunctions granted
- Legal Topics
- Natural Justice / Procedural Fairness, Compulsory Acquisition, Interlocutory Injunctions, Statutory Construction, Oppression and Members' Interests in Associations, Sub Leases and Rights of Occupancy in Aboriginal Town Camps
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barbara Rachel Shaw
Applicant
George Robertson Jampitjinpa
Applicant
Gwen Gillen
Applicant
Warren Tonkin
Applicant
Melissa Brown
Applicant
Marlene Hayes
Applicant
Kevin Wirri
Applicant
Vanessa Kruger
Applicant
Maureen Williams
Applicant
Rachel Jurra
Applicant
Rosemary Rubuntja
Applicant
Audrey McCormack
Applicant
Pamela Sampson
Applicant
Cheryl McMillan
Applicant
Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs
Respondent / First Respondent
Executive Director of Township Leasing
Second Respondent
Northern Territory of Australia
Third Respondent
Iiparpa Aboriginal Corporation
Fourth Respondent
Karnte Aboriginal Corporation
Fourth Respondent
Anthepe Housing Association
Fourth Respondent
Ilyperenye Association Inc
Fourth Respondent
Inarlange Community Inc
Fourth Respondent
Mpwetyerre Aboriginal Corporation
Fourth Respondent
Yarrrenyte Arltere Association Inc
Fourth Respondent
Akngwertnarre Association Inc
Fourth Respondent
Nyewente Association Inc
Fourth Respondent
Anthelk Ewlpaye Association Inc
Fourth Respondent
Aper Alwerrknge Association Inc
Fourth Respondent
Mt Nancy Housing Association Inc
Fourth Respondent
Ilperle Tyathe Association Inc
Fourth Respondent
Ilpeye Ilpeye Aboriginal Corporation
Fourth Respondent
Ewyenper Atwatye Association Inc
Fourth Respondent
Anhelke Aboriginal Corporation
Fourth Respondent
Lhenpe Artnew Aboriginal Corporation
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Representative/interlocutory Injunction Applications / Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister is obliged to accord procedural fairness/natural justice to tenants before issuing a notice under s 47(1) of the Northern Territory National Emergency Response Act 2007 (Cth)
- 2 Whether entering into 40 year sub-leases is contrary to the interests of members of the Housing Associations as a whole and actionable under s 109 of the Associations Act 2003 (NT) and s 166 of the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth)
- 3 Whether interlocutory relief (injunctions) should be granted restraining the Minister, Housing Associations, and other parties from taking certain actions pending final determination
Ratio Decidendi
There is a serious question to be tried as to whether the Minister is obliged to accord the tenants affected by a proposed notice under s 47(1) of the NER Act clear information about the extinguishment of their tenancy rights and a fair opportunity to be heard. The current measures have not adequately discharged that obligation. There is also a serious question to be tried in respect of whether the execution of the proposed sub-leases by Housing Associations is contrary to the interests of members as a whole in the absence of the compulsion threat. The balance of convenience favours restraining the Minister and the other parties from acting as proposed until the affected persons are...
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunctions granted
Orders
- Minister restrained from giving a notice under s 47(1) of the Northern Territory National Emergency Response Act 2007 (Cth) until further order, pending satisfaction of procedural fairness obligations.
- Housing Associations, Director, and Northern Territory restrained from entering into/giving effect to sub-leases of specified lands with each other until trial or further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment