Barclay Homes (Australia) Pty Ltd v Fair Trading Tribunal & Anor [2001] NSWSC 711

Barclay Homes (Australia) Pty Ltd v Fair Trading Tribunal & Anor [2001] NSWSC 711

Sections 92 and 94 of the Home Building Act 1989 as amended have prospective, not retrospective, operation; there is no clear and unequivocal intention of the legislature to deprive homeowners of existing immunities from suit or to retrospectively apply the sections, and the presumption against retrospectivity must be upheld.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; summons dismissed; lower tribunal decision affirmed; costs ordered against plaintiff.
Legal Topics
['retrospectivity of Legislation' 'home Building Act 1989' 'appeals From Tribunal' 'legal Interpretation']
['administrative Law' 'building and Construction'] ['retrospectivity of Legislation' 'home Building Act 1989' 'appeals From Tribunal' 'legal Interpretation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether ss 92 and 94 of the Home Building Act 1989 as amended operate retrospectively' 'Whether deprivation of immunity from suit can occur without clear legislative intent' 'Whether the presumption against retrospective operation is rebutted']

Ratio Decidendi

Sections 92 and 94 of the Home Building Act 1989 as amended have prospective, not retrospective, operation; there is no clear and unequivocal intention of the legislature to deprive homeowners of existing immunities from suit or to retrospectively apply the sections, and the presumption against retrospectivity must be upheld.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; summons dismissed; lower tribunal decision affirmed; costs ordered against plaintiff.

Orders

  • ['The decision of the Deputy Chairperson dated 27 April 2001 is affirmed.' 'The appeal is dismissed.' 'The summons is dismissed.' "The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs as agreed or assessed."]