Inspector Maurice Vierow v Barclay Mowlem Construction Limited [2008] NSWIRComm 1
Barclay Mowlem Construction Limited failed to ensure a safe system of work, safe plant, and adequate information, training, and supervision for both employees and non-employees on site, resulting in foreseeable, serious risks and actual fatal and serious injuries; the objective seriousness was high, and despite prior good practices and subsequent remedial actions, substantial penalties are required for both general and specific deterrence, and the totality principle requires the sentences reflect distinct breaches of duty to employees and non-employees.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- defendant convicted on both charges; fines imposed; costs awarded to prosecutor
- Legal Topics
- ['employer Duties' 'workplace Deaths' 'workplace Injury' 'safe Work Systems' 'plant Safety' 'training and Supervision' 'sentencing' 'totality' 'parity']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant failed to ensure health, safety, and welfare of employees under s 8(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000' 'Whether the defendant failed to ensure non-employees were not exposed to risks under s 8(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000' 'How objective and subjective seriousness and parity affect sentence']
Ratio Decidendi
Barclay Mowlem Construction Limited failed to ensure a safe system of work, safe plant, and adequate information, training, and supervision for both employees and non-employees on site, resulting in foreseeable, serious risks and actual fatal and serious injuries; the objective seriousness was high, and despite prior good practices and subsequent remedial actions, substantial penalties are required for both general and specific deterrence, and the totality principle requires the sentences reflect distinct breaches of duty to employees and non-employees.
Court Disposition
defendant convicted on both charges; fines imposed; costs awarded to prosecutor
Orders
- ["IRC 34 of 2007: Defendant convicted under s 8(1) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000; fined $150,000 (moiety to prosecutor); pay prosecutor's costs as agreed or assessed." "IRC 35 of 2007: Defendant convicted under s 8(2) Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000; fined $150,000 (moiety to prosecutor); pay...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment