Barde AS v Oceanfast Ferries Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 315
The defendant did not establish there is sound reason in the interests of justice and the efficient administration of the Court to direct that the proceedings be transferred to the Western Australian Registry, especially given that significant work had been done in Sydney, witnesses and documents are located in Sydney, and communications technology can assist in dealing with remote parties or evidence.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Interlocutory Application to Transfer Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
- Legal Topics
- ['transfer of Proceedings' 'forum' 'case Management']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application / Interlocutory Application to Transfer Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceedings should be transferred from the New South Wales Registry to the Western Australian Registry of the Federal Court.']
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant did not establish there is sound reason in the interests of justice and the efficient administration of the Court to direct that the proceedings be transferred to the Western Australian Registry, especially given that significant work had been done in Sydney, witnesses and documents are located in Sydney, and communications technology can assist in dealing with remote parties or evidence.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment