Barker Group NSW Pty Ltd v Albury City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1259
Because the parties reached agreement after a s 34 conciliation conference and the Commissioner was satisfied that the amended development application complied sufficiently with the applicable statutory and planning requirements and that the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of by granting leave to amend the application, upholding the appeal, and approving the amended development application subject to conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal Against Actual Refusal of Development Application Under S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Orders Following Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; amended development application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'residential Flat Building' 'conciliation Conference' 'amended Plans' 'conditions of Consent' 'sepp 65 Design Quality' 'basix' 'contaminated Land' 'essential Services' 'earthworks']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal Against Actual Refusal of Development Application Under S 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Orders Following Conciliation Conference Under S 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could make orders under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 giving effect to the parties' agreement to approve the amended development application subject to conditions." 'Whether applicable statutory and environmental planning requirements had been addressed for the amended residential flat building development.' 'Whether the site was suitable for the proposed development having regard to prior service station use and contamination considerations.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached agreement after a s 34 conciliation conference and the Commissioner was satisfied that the amended development application complied sufficiently with the applicable statutory and planning requirements and that the agreed decision was one the Court could make in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were disposed of by granting leave to amend the application, upholding the appeal, and approving the amended development application subject to conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; amended development application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['Leave is granted to the Applicant to amend Development Application No. 10.2021.38929.1 and rely on the amended plans listed at Condition 1 of Annexure A to this agreement.' 'The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. 10.2021.38929.1 seeking consent for a three-storey residential flat building comprising...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment