Barrett Bowyangs Pty Ltd & Anor v Leichhardt Municipal Council [1999] NSWLEC 116
Given the building's characteristics, the unique constraints of adaptive reuse, and the policy objectives favoring such reuse, strict compliance with density and landscaping standards under cl 10 of LEP 20 is unnecessary and unreasonable; the development, as conditioned, reasonably adapts an industrial building for residential use without undue detriment to planning principles or neighbourhood amenity.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal upheld; consent granted subject to conditions
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'adaptive Reuse' 'residential Zoning' 'heritage Conservation' 'sepp 1 Objections' 'landscaping Standards' 'car Parking Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed adaptive reuse complies with density and landscaped area standards under LEP 20' 'Whether granting a SEPP 1 objection is appropriate given the design, historical fabric, and planning objectives' 'Adequacy of car parking, private open space, solar access, ventilation, and streetscape impact']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the building's characteristics, the unique constraints of adaptive reuse, and the policy objectives favoring such reuse, strict compliance with density and landscaping standards under cl 10 of LEP 20 is unnecessary and unreasonable; the development, as conditioned, reasonably adapts an industrial building for residential use without undue detriment to planning principles or neighbourhood amenity.
Court Disposition
appeal upheld; consent granted subject to conditions
Orders
- ['Appeal upheld.' 'Development Application No 172/98 to convert an existing two storey industrial building into eight residential units with ten car spaces at 11 - 13 Wells Street, Annandale is determined by granting consent subject to the conditions attached.' 'The exhibits, except Exhibit A, may be returned.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment