Barrick (Australia Pacific Exploration) Pty Limited v Barrick (PD) Australia Pty Limited, in the matter of Barrick (Australia Pacific Exploration) Pty Limited [2017] FCA 998
The requirements for convening meetings under s 411(1)—that each scheme is an appropriate arrangement, each company is a Part 5.1 body with eligible members, ASIC has had the proper opportunity for input, and adequate disclosure has been provided—are satisfied; the schemes are not inappropriate and should go to a member vote, with further approval to be considered at a second court hearing.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Barrick (Australia Pacific Exploration) Pty Limited; Second Plaintiff: Barrick (GSM) Pty Limited; Third Plaintiff: Delta Gold Pty Limited; Fourth Plaintiff: Barrick (Kalgoorlie) Pty Limited; Fifth Plaintiff: AurionGold Pty Limited; Sixth Plaintiff: Barrick (Granny Smith) Pty Limited; Defendant: Barrick (PD) Australia Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application for Scheme of Arrangement / First Court Hearing for Orders to Convene Meetings Under S 411(1) Corporations Act 2001 (cth)
- Outcome
- Orders made convening meetings of members of each plaintiff company to consider and, if thought fit, approve with or without modifications, the proposed schemes of arrangement.
- Legal Topics
- Schemes of Arrangement, Internal Corporate Reconstruction, Part 5.1 Corporations Act, Members' Scheme, Amalgamation, Corporate Group Structures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barrick (Australia Pacific Exploration) Pty Limited
First Plaintiff
Barrick (GSM) Pty Limited
Second Plaintiff
Delta Gold Pty Limited
Third Plaintiff
Barrick (Kalgoorlie) Pty Limited
Fourth Plaintiff
AurionGold Pty Limited
Fifth Plaintiff
Barrick (Granny Smith) Pty Limited
Sixth Plaintiff
Barrick (PD) Australia Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application for Scheme of Arrangement / First Court Hearing for Orders to Convene Meetings Under S 411(1) Corporations Act 2001 (cth)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should make orders convening meetings of members to consider and approve six interdependent schemes of arrangement for internal corporate reconstruction under s 411(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
- 2 Whether each scheme is an ‘arrangement’ within the meaning of s 411(1)
- 3 Whether proper disclosure has been made via the explanatory statement under s 412(1)(a)
Ratio Decidendi
The requirements for convening meetings under s 411(1)—that each scheme is an appropriate arrangement, each company is a Part 5.1 body with eligible members, ASIC has had the proper opportunity for input, and adequate disclosure has been provided—are satisfied; the schemes are not inappropriate and should go to a member vote, with further approval to be considered at a second court hearing.
Court Disposition
Orders made convening meetings of members of each plaintiff company to consider and, if thought fit, approve with or without modifications, the proposed schemes of arrangement.
Orders
- Meetings of holders of fully paid ordinary shares in each plaintiff to be convened on specified dates and times in Perth to consider and if thought fit approve schemes of arrangement (Order 1).
- Approval of the explanatory statement (Order 2).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment