Notification under s130 by Broken Hill Chamber of Commerce Inc. of a dispute with Barrier Industrial Council re Broken Hill Commerce and Industry Consent Award [2002] NSWIRComm 89
The Commission applied the earlier reasoning of Bishop C on the same award provision and held that mineworkers' conditions and the basis for those conditions had changed too dramatically to permit a comparable assessment with Award rates and conditions. Clause 19:16 was to operate so that a 4.5% loading applied to the Award rates of pay; those rates comprehended all "mine privileges" except the lead bonus, which would continue to be paid; and Award employees would receive shift penalties and overtime rates according to the Hours of Work, Overtime and Shift provisions of the Award, not according to past practice or the former mineworkers' agreement. Because that interpretation made the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Dispute Notification Pursuant to S 130 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996 Concerning Interpretation of Clause 19:16 of the Broken Hill Commerce and Industry Consent Award / Decision Determining the Interpretation Issue Pursuant to S 175 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996
- Outcome
- Clause 19:16 interpreted; proposed award variation not made; proceedings concluded.
- Legal Topics
- ['award Interpretation' 'conditions of Employment for Employees Working on Mine Leases' 'hours of Work, Overtime and Shift Penalties' 'mine Privileges and Lead Bonus' 'award Variation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Dispute Notification Pursuant to S 130 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996 Concerning Interpretation of Clause 19:16 of the Broken Hill Commerce and Industry Consent Award / Decision Determining the Interpretation Issue Pursuant to S 175 of the Industrial Relations Act, 1996
Legal Issues
- 1 ["What conditions apply under clause 19:16 of the Metals Section of the Broken Hill Commerce and Industry Consent Award when award employees work on productive mining leases and in mining companies' interests." "Whether employees covered by the Award should receive overtime and shift penalties according to the Award or according to past mineworkers' conditions or practice." 'Whether clause 19:16 should be varied in the terms proposed by the Broken Hill Chamber of Commerce.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Commission applied the earlier reasoning of Bishop C on the same award provision and held that mineworkers' conditions and the basis for those conditions had changed too dramatically to permit a comparable assessment with Award rates and conditions. Clause 19:16 was to operate so that a 4.5% loading applied to the Award rates of pay; those rates comprehended all "mine privileges" except the lead bonus, which would continue to be paid; and Award employees would receive shift penalties and overtime rates according to the Hours of Work, Overtime and Shift provisions of the Award, not according to past practice or the former mineworkers' agreement. Because that interpretation made the...
Court Disposition
Clause 19:16 interpreted; proposed award variation not made; proceedings concluded.
Orders
- ['A 4.5% loading is applicable to the Award rates of pay.' 'The rates of pay in the Award comprehend all "mine privileges" save for the lead bonus, which will continue to be paid.' "Employees under the Award shall receive shift penalties and overtime rates according to the Hours of Work, Overtime and Shift...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment