Cotter v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 587
The interrogatories administered are relevant to the issue of reasonableness in the defendant's statutory qualified privilege defence and are not shown to be oppressive or vexatious. The defendant is ordered to answer all interrogatories, with exceptions only to the extent that answers would identify confidential sources in accordance with the 'newspaper rule'.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Interrogatories
- Outcome
- Application granted with qualification regarding source-identifying answers
- Legal Topics
- ['interrogatories' 'qualified Privilege' 'statutory Defences' 'reasonableness of Publication' 'newspaper Rule']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Interlocutory Application Regarding Interrogatories
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendant should be required to answer all or any of the interrogatories administered by the plaintiff' 'Whether objections to the interrogatories on grounds of being vexatious, oppressive, or irrelevant are valid in the context of a qualified privilege defence under s 22 of the Defamation Act 1974' "Application of the 'newspaper rule' to refusal to answer interrogatories that would reveal sources"]
Ratio Decidendi
The interrogatories administered are relevant to the issue of reasonableness in the defendant's statutory qualified privilege defence and are not shown to be oppressive or vexatious. The defendant is ordered to answer all interrogatories, with exceptions only to the extent that answers would identify confidential sources in accordance with the 'newspaper rule'.
Court Disposition
Application granted with qualification regarding source-identifying answers
Orders
- ['Defendant ordered to answer all interrogatories except to the extent that an answer would identify the source of its information' "Defendant to pay the whole of the plaintiff's costs of the application"]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment