Johnson v Building Professionals Board [2008] NSWADT 61
The Tribunal found that fire hose reels were not installed when Mr Johnson issued the final occupation certificate and that there was no objective evidence supporting the suggested theft of an installed system. Issuing an occupation certificate for a residential development without required fire hose reels was a serious omission falling short of the standard reasonably expected of a competent accredited certifier. The Board's finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct, reprimand and $7,500 fine were the correct and preferable decision and the fine was not excessive.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Review of Disciplinary Finding and Orders Under S 33 of the Building Professionals Act 2005 / Principal Matter; Decision on Review
- Outcome
- Application for review dismissed; disciplinary finding and orders affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- ['review of Disciplinary Finding and Action' 'unsatisfactory Professional Conduct by Accredited Certifier' 'occupation Certificate' 'fire Safety Measures' 'fine and Reprimand']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of Disciplinary Finding and Orders Under S 33 of the Building Professionals Act 2005 / Principal Matter; Decision on Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Mr Johnson issued a final occupation certificate when required fire hose reels had not been installed.' 'Whether the conduct amounted to unsatisfactory professional conduct.' 'Whether the reprimand and fine of $7,500 should be affirmed on review.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that fire hose reels were not installed when Mr Johnson issued the final occupation certificate and that there was no objective evidence supporting the suggested theft of an installed system. Issuing an occupation certificate for a residential development without required fire hose reels was a serious omission falling short of the standard reasonably expected of a competent accredited certifier. The Board's finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct, reprimand and $7,500 fine were the correct and preferable decision and the fine was not excessive.
Court Disposition
Application for review dismissed; disciplinary finding and orders affirmed.
Orders
- ['Application for review dismissed.' 'Finding of unsatisfactory professional conduct affirmed.' 'Order that the Applicant be reprimanded affirmed.' 'Order that the applicant pay a fine of $7,500 within one month of receiving the notice of decision affirmed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment