Barua v Leichhardt Council [2008] NSWLEC 1472
The proposal complies with all relevant planning controls, fits within the building envelope established by DCP 2000, and presents an acceptable appearance to Darling Street and Little Arthur Street. Opinions about streetscape appearance are subjective, and objectors’ concerns do not justify refusal in light of compliance.
- Parties
- Applicant: Barua Pty Ltd; Respondent: Leichhardt Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Heritage Conservation, Streetscape Compatibility, Building Envelope
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barua Pty Ltd
Applicant
Leichhardt Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Deemed Refusal of Development Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the proposed development fit into the Darling Street streetscape?
- 2 Is the proposal excessively bulky towards Little Arthur Street?
- 3 Does the proposal comply with relevant planning controls for the conservation area?
Ratio Decidendi
The proposal complies with all relevant planning controls, fits within the building envelope established by DCP 2000, and presents an acceptable appearance to Darling Street and Little Arthur Street. Opinions about streetscape appearance are subjective, and objectors’ concerns do not justify refusal in light of compliance.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Development application to demolish the existing service station and erect a mixed retail and residential development containing four shops, eight apartments and 16 car spaces on lots 3 and 4 DP 223, known as 418 Darling Street, Balmain is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment