Basegrove Holdings Pty Ltd v Centaur Mining and Exploration Limited [2001] FCA 259

Basegrove Holdings Pty Ltd v Centaur Mining and Exploration Limited [2001] FCA 259

The current pleading fails to particularise how the respondent's conduct was misleading or deceptive or likely to be so, rendering it defective; however, it is possible for the applicants to plead such a case properly, and thus they should be given leave to amend.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Motion to Strike Out Statement of Claim / Interlocutory
Outcome
Respondent's motion to strike out held over. Applicants given leave to amend statement of claim. Costs reserved.
Legal Topics
['misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'federal Jurisdiction' 'pleading Requirements' 'jurisdiction Accrued']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Motion to Strike Out Statement of Claim / Interlocutory

  1. 1 ['Whether a federal cause of action under s 52 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) is properly pleaded' 'Whether the alleged misleading or deceptive conduct is sufficiently particularised' "Whether the pleading discloses a cause of action within the Federal Court's jurisdiction"]

Ratio Decidendi

The current pleading fails to particularise how the respondent's conduct was misleading or deceptive or likely to be so, rendering it defective; however, it is possible for the applicants to plead such a case properly, and thus they should be given leave to amend.

Court Disposition

Respondent's motion to strike out held over. Applicants given leave to amend statement of claim. Costs reserved.

Orders

  • ["The respondent's motion to strike out the statement of claim be held over." 'The applicants have leave to amend their statement of claim within 21 days.' 'Costs are reserved.']