Basetec Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (No 7) [2016] FCA 1587

Basetec Services Pty Ltd v Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd (No 7) [2016] FCA 1587

Basetec is entitled to an amount equal to the GST exclusive consideration multiplied by the prevailing rate of GST as a contractual entitlement, not an actual GST payment. Interest is to be calculated on the judgment sum including GST from the date of contract termination.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Final Orders After Trial and Delivery of Principal Judgment; Orders as to Form, Interest and Costs
Outcome
Judgment for applicant on claim; judgment for respondent on cross-claim; set-off; stay of enforcement; directions for submissions on costs and stay application.
Legal Topics
['monies Owing Under Contract' 'interest Calculation' 'gst and Contractual Entitlement']
['contract Law'] ['monies Owing Under Contract' 'interest Calculation' 'gst and Contractual Entitlement']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contract Dispute / Final Orders After Trial and Delivery of Principal Judgment; Orders as to Form, Interest and Costs

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether interest is payable on GST under the contract' 'Date from which interest is payable on the judgment sum']

Ratio Decidendi

Basetec is entitled to an amount equal to the GST exclusive consideration multiplied by the prevailing rate of GST as a contractual entitlement, not an actual GST payment. Interest is to be calculated on the judgment sum including GST from the date of contract termination.

Court Disposition

Judgment for applicant on claim; judgment for respondent on cross-claim; set-off; stay of enforcement; directions for submissions on costs and stay application.

Orders

  • ['Judgment in favour of Basetec against Leighton in the sum of $911,328.89.' 'Judgment on the cross-claim in favour of Leighton against Basetec in the sum of $105,765.10.' 'The judgment in favour of Leighton to be set off against the judgment on the claim.' 'Enforcement of the judgments stayed until further order.'...