Bathurst Real Estate Pty Ltd v Fairbrother (No 2) 408 [2022] NSWSC 408
The Calderbank offer made by the defendants was not a genuine compromise, was made too early in the proceedings with minimal costs incurred by both sides, and was open for acceptance for an unreasonably short period; thus, it was not unreasonable for BRE to refuse. Costs follow the event, with BRE to pay the defendants’ costs on the ordinary basis.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Equity / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed; Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offers' 'party/party Costs' 'bases of Quantification']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity / Post Judgment (costs Determination)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether defendants are entitled to indemnity costs based on a Calderbank offer' 'Whether plaintiff acted unreasonably in refusing settlement offer']
Ratio Decidendi
The Calderbank offer made by the defendants was not a genuine compromise, was made too early in the proceedings with minimal costs incurred by both sides, and was open for acceptance for an unreasonably short period; thus, it was not unreasonable for BRE to refuse. Costs follow the event, with BRE to pay the defendants’ costs on the ordinary basis.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed; Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs.
Orders
- ['Proceedings dismissed.' "Plaintiff to pay the defendants' costs." 'Direct the exhibits be returned to the parties to be held in accordance with Practice Note SC Gen 18, para 28.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment