Bathurst Regional Council v Local Government Financial Services Pty Ltd (No 5) [2012] FCA 1200
The Court found the Councils' claims against LGFS, S&P and ABN Amro for misleading and deceptive conduct, negligence and (in some cases) breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty were made out. Proportionate liability regimes applied except with respect to equitable compensation for fiduciary breach. Damages are to be calculated as the principal amount paid for Rembrandt notes less cash out returned, no deduction for coupon payments. LGFS is entitled to contribution from S&P and ABN Amro. The claim by LGFS against AHAC for indemnity is also established. Directions are to be made for interest and costs.
- Parties
- Applicant: Bathurst Regional Council; First Respondent: Local Government Financial Services Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: ABN AMRO Bank NV; Third Respondent: McGraw-Hill International (UK) Limited; Cross Claimant on the Fifth Cross Claim: American Home Assurance Company; Applicant: Cooma Monaro Shire Council; Applicant: Corowa Shire Council; Applicant: Deniliquin Council; Applicant: Eurobodalla Shire Council; Applicant: Moree Plains Shire Council; Applicant: Murray Shire Council; Applicant: Narrandera Shire Council; Applicant: Narromine Shire Council; Applicant: Oberon Council; Applicant: Orange City Council; Applicant: Parkes Shire Council; Applicant: City of Ryde; Applicant: StateCover Mutual Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Reasons for Judgment Following Trial; Orders for Further Submissions and Directions
- Outcome
- Findings for the Councils (applicants) on substantial parts of the claims; findings for LGFS against S&P and ABN Amro; indemnity in favour of LGFS against AHAC. Orders for further submissions on interest, costs, and final orders.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Financial Services, Implied Warranties, Australian Financial Services Licence, Derivatives, Debentures, Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Rescission, Damages, Fiduciary Duty, Duty of Care, Restitution, Proportionate Liability, Insurance Indemnity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bathurst Regional Council
Applicant
Local Government Financial Services Pty Ltd
First Respondent
ABN AMRO Bank NV
Second Respondent
McGraw-Hill International (UK) Limited
Third Respondent
American Home Assurance Company
Cross Claimant on the Fifth Cross Claim
Cooma Monaro Shire Council
Applicant
Corowa Shire Council
Applicant
Deniliquin Council
Applicant
Eurobodalla Shire Council
Applicant
Moree Plains Shire Council
Applicant
Murray Shire Council
Applicant
Narrandera Shire Council
Applicant
Narromine Shire Council
Applicant
Oberon Council
Applicant
Orange City Council
Applicant
Parkes Shire Council
Applicant
City of Ryde
Applicant
StateCover Mutual Limited
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Reasons for Judgment Following Trial; Orders for Further Submissions and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Were the representations by LGFS, S&P, and ABN Amro misleading or deceptive?
- 2 Did LGFS breach duties of care to the Councils?
- 3 Was there a breach of contract by LGFS to the Councils (Cooma and Corowa)?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found the Councils' claims against LGFS, S&P and ABN Amro for misleading and deceptive conduct, negligence and (in some cases) breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty were made out. Proportionate liability regimes applied except with respect to equitable compensation for fiduciary breach. Damages are to be calculated as the principal amount paid for Rembrandt notes less cash out returned, no deduction for coupon payments. LGFS is entitled to contribution from S&P and ABN Amro. The claim by LGFS against AHAC for indemnity is also established. Directions are to be made for interest and costs.
Court Disposition
Findings for the Councils (applicants) on substantial parts of the claims; findings for LGFS against S&P and ABN Amro; indemnity in favour of LGFS against AHAC. Orders for further submissions on interest, costs, and final orders.
Orders
- The parties are to confer and submit an agreed or competing timetable for submissions on outstanding issues of interest and costs and for making final orders within 21 days.
- The proceeding is to be listed for directions on a date to be determined in consultation with the parties within a further 14 days thereafter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment