Baulkham Hills Shire Council v Basemount Pty Ltd & Anor [2003] NSWCA 189
Because the Commissioner had previously determined the same factual merit issues for the same development applications, there was a reasonable apprehension of pre-judgment; thus, remitter must be to a differently constituted bench. The wider discretion under s56A(2)(b) permits exclusionary orders. Costs should follow the event after reversal of the primary judge’s decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of Court of Appeal After Leave Granted
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['development Applications' 'procedural Fairness' 'bias Apprehension' 'remitter Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of Court of Appeal After Leave Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a reasonable apprehension of bias required remittal to a different Commissioner' 'Whether procedural fairness was denied' 'Scope of remitter for reconsideration of development applications' 'Entitlement to costs following outcome reversal']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the Commissioner had previously determined the same factual merit issues for the same development applications, there was a reasonable apprehension of pre-judgment; thus, remitter must be to a differently constituted bench. The wider discretion under s56A(2)(b) permits exclusionary orders. Costs should follow the event after reversal of the primary judge’s decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- ['Set aside Order (3) made by Pearlman J on 2 October 2002' 'Both proceedings remitted to a Commissioner or Commissioners (other than Commissioner Murrell) or to a Judge of the Court for re-hearing and re-determination conformably with these reasons for judgment' 'Respondents to pay the costs of the Council in the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment