Bayley & Associates Pty Ltd v Jenkins [2010] FCA 1306
The court found the motion for security for costs premature as it was brought before a defence was filed, and that the evidence did not establish any real likelihood that the applicant would be unable to meet an adverse costs order up to $103,304.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Motion / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed
- Legal Topics
- []
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Motion / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be ordered to provide security for costs to the second and fourth respondents']
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the motion for security for costs premature as it was brought before a defence was filed, and that the evidence did not establish any real likelihood that the applicant would be unable to meet an adverse costs order up to $103,304.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed
Orders
- ['The motion of the second and fourth respondents dated 22 September 2010 for the applicant to provide security for costs in the amount of $103,304 is dismissed.' "The second and fourth respondents pay the applicant's costs of the motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment