Regina v BB [2005] NSWCCA 215

Regina v BB [2005] NSWCCA 215

The sentencing judge did not commit an error in principle by treating the Form 1 malicious wounding as aggravating the principal offence's objective seriousness, and adequately considered relevant factors including the delay; hence, the sentence was not manifestly excessive, and there was no basis for appellate intervention.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 June 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'use of Form 1 Offences' 'aggravated Offences' 'delay and Hardship in Sentencing' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'use of Form 1 Offences' 'aggravated Offences' 'delay and Hardship in Sentencing' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether taking into account a Form 1 offence as aggravating the principal offence constituted an error of law' 'Whether the sentencing judge gave insufficient consideration to delay and its hardship' 'Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge did not commit an error in principle by treating the Form 1 malicious wounding as aggravating the principal offence's objective seriousness, and adequately considered relevant factors including the delay; hence, the sentence was not manifestly excessive, and there was no basis for appellate intervention.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Application for leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal dismissed']